In my blog post SICK PRIORITIES – I made reference to the compensation Charlotte Church received (alleged to be upto £600,000) and compared it to compensation given to victims of accidents or soldiers injured in battle.
I agree that’s an obscene amount of money Charlotte Church was awarded and she’ll probably donate it to charity
I have no idea what Charlotte Church will do with the money, and I do not criticise her for accepting such a sum. There is no reason why she should give money aware. There is no obligation, in my view upon her to do so.
My post was criticising the legal syatem. These cases ( accident and phone hacking) were civil cases and the award of compensation was not meant to punish the defendant, but to compensate the claimant. Although Charlotte Church’s case was settled outside court, it would have been at a level near that which the courts would have awarded. It is the court’s approach to compensation that I feel is sick in awarding 10-100 times ore compensation for having someone listen to your phonecalls than for lifelong injury
In my blog post How to Win friends & Influence People I posted about cyclists who manage to upset others and turn people’s opinion against cyclists in general.
Any campaign is a good campaign that encourages the UK roads to be a better place to cycle
I agree entirely with this. My post was explaining why campaigns waging war on other road users will not make the UK roads a better place to cycle